Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter… [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
July 31, 2019) the Eighth Circuit continued the sensible holding that an ADA plaintiff does not have standing to sue concerning ADA violations he never encountered because he cannot have suffered an injury from an unencountered violation. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
Ohio Dept. of Veterans Servs, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-3308. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[End Notes 1 - 28 are provided following the text below with permission.]Modern disciplinary procedures seek to correct undesirable employee behavior and to rehabilitate the worker. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Stapleton v La Paglia, 207 AD2d 945]Terminating a corrections officer who used excessive force against a prisoner while going to the aid of a fellow officer who has struggling with the inmate. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
One of those was State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The MassHealth regulation at 130 CMR 520.023(C)(1)(d) itself does not support the interpretation given to it by the Office of Medicaid [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:34 am
New York City Dept. of Educ., Judge Peter H. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
Such decision-making does not comport with the Correction Law, and runs [athwart] the presumption of rehabilitation afforded by Correction Law § 753(2) (see, e.g., Matter of Dellaporte v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
It rejects imprisonment as a means of promoting rehabilitation, 28 U. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm
Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction, the plaintiff was employed by ODRC as a Senior Parole Officer. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” In Matisoff v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
., et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
The First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the ATSA clearly eliminates any cause of action under the Rehabilitation Act for TSA screeners. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
All Correction Law §753 factors must be considered before disqualifying an applicant because of his or her conviction of a crimeMatter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 02073, Court of AppealsIn this decision the Court of Appeals explains that where a prospective employer rejects an applicant for employment because of that individual’s conviction of a crime, Correction Law §753 requires that the employer must determine that… [read post]
