Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[End Notes 1 - 28 are provided following the text below with permission.]Modern disciplinary procedures seek to correct undesirable employee behavior and to rehabilitate the worker. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am
The Court of Appeal has subsequently held in Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Tennessee Dept. of Transp., No. 07-6491 (6th Cir. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
Code §§ 7448-7467 does not intrude on the Legislature’s workers’ compensation authority and does not violate the single-subject rule, but declares that portions of the law are invalid on separation of powers grounds) Earley v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
July 31, 2019) the Eighth Circuit continued the sensible holding that an ADA plaintiff does not have standing to sue concerning ADA violations he never encountered because he cannot have suffered an injury from an unencountered violation. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
It rejects imprisonment as a means of promoting rehabilitation, 28 U. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” In Matisoff v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
If it does not, the compensation act does not disturb any existing remedy. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
In New York City, multiple dwellings may qualify for tax incentives designed to encourage rehabilitation and improvements (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 11-243 [previously § J51-2.5]). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
The First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the ATSA clearly eliminates any cause of action under the Rehabilitation Act for TSA screeners. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Clearlake Rehabilitation Hospital Inc (Race (B))Paul v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The MassHealth regulation at 130 CMR 520.023(C)(1)(d) itself does not support the interpretation given to it by the Office of Medicaid [read post]
