Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The Court of Appeal has subsequently held in Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Tennessee Dept. of Transp., No. 07-6491 (6th Cir. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code §§ 7448-7467 does not intrude on the Legislature’s workers’ compensation authority and does not violate the single-subject rule, but declares that portions of the law are invalid on separation of powers grounds) Earley v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
July 31, 2019) the Eighth Circuit continued the sensible holding that an ADA plaintiff does not have standing to sue concerning ADA violations he never encountered because he cannot have suffered an injury from an unencountered violation. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
In New York City, multiple dwellings may qualify for tax incentives designed to encourage rehabilitation and improvements (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 11-243 [previously § J51-2.5]). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
The First Circuit affirmed, concluding that the ATSA clearly eliminates any cause of action under the Rehabilitation Act for TSA screeners. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The MassHealth regulation at 130 CMR 520.023(C)(1)(d) itself does not support the interpretation given to it by the Office of Medicaid [read post]