Search for: "Doe v. General Services Admin."
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 1:50 pm
The Queen on the application of Mr Peter Gaskin v LB Richmond Upon Thames (2018) EWHC 1996 (Admin) (Not on Bailli yet. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
The appeal in the case of Heesom v Public Services Ombudsman for Wales ([2014] EWHC 1504 (Admin)) was brought by a former Welsh Councillor against his disqualification from being a member of a Council. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
(Eg R (on the application of) Paul-Coker v London Borough of Southwark [2006] EWHC 497 (Admin) ). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am
The much-anticipated decision in R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin) has arrived, confirming that in an emergency, “Everyone In” really does mean everyone. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
The judgment in Minister for Legal Aid v Main, R (on the application of) [2007] EWCA Civ 1147 might be of limited general applicability, concerning as it does the provision of ’special case’ legal aid funding for inquests, but one passage in the judgment caught my eye: The relevant statutory provisions and the non-statutory material are somewhat complex. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:14 pm
Admin. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 4:32 am
R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [link is to a .doc] was discussed by us (via news reports in Inside Housing and on Radio 4) below. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
[…] But that does not mean that the statute provides a general authority for regulations which tie remuneration to success. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
R (on the application of MK) v Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 3486 (Admin) [Judgment on Lexis, not on Bailii yet]A judicial review raising the extent of a Council’s duties and powers under s.17 Children Act 1989 and s.1 Localism Act 2011 (the general power of competence) in providing housing for someone not otherwise eligible for housing assistance.MK was from Nigeria. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
R (on the application of MK) v Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 3486 (Admin) [Judgment on Lexis, not on Bailii yet]A judicial review raising the extent of a Council’s duties and powers under s.17 Children Act 1989 and s.1 Localism Act 2011 (the general power of competence) in providing housing for someone not otherwise eligible for housing assistance.MK was from Nigeria. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:32 am
Admin. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Post Grant Admin: SightSound Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:55 am
Probert v. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 11:43 pm
This does a lot more than just talk about fees. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:19 pm
Shaw v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Some of the back history of this case was in R (Kelly, Mehari and JI) v Birmingham City Council [2009] EWHC 3240 (Admin) (our note) and R (Khazai, Ebrahim, Azizi and Mirghani) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) (our note), in both of which Birmingham faced substantial criticism of their homeless procedures and gatekeeping. [read post]
