Search for: "Doe v. General Services Admin."
Results 81 - 100
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
Admin. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Zhang v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the UK’s ‘supervisory authority’, as required by the Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) (superseded by the EU General Data Protection Regulation and later the UK General Data Protection Regulation) on all matters concerning personal data. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
Bukartyk, R (on the application of) v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2019) EWHC 3480 (Admin) A judicial review of a refusal to take a second homeless application which should really be put in the ‘Councils, don’t do this’ list of things that councils shouldn’t do. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
The General Dental Council v Savery and others [2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin) – Read judgment Mr Justice Sales in the High Court has ruled that the General Dental Council’s (GDC) use and disclosure of the dental records of fourteen patients of a registered dentist who was the subject of investigation was lawful. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 10:00 pm
McMillan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
As Nursing Care Mgmt. of America v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:11 am
Indiana Family & Social Services Admin. , a 14-page opinion, the panel decides that the FSSA does not need to grant a contract to every qualified applicant that applies. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
., v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 536, 52 O.R. (2d) 799 (note), 17 Admin. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
One only has to contrast that approach with that adopted in the case of R (Bonhoeffer) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin) (see this blog’s commentary) to be concerned whether that can be correct. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm
GA v. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
Does the 2016 USPTO document authorize Hirshfeld to act even if the FVRA does not? [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
In the courts SA (Iranian Arabs-no general risk) Iran CG [2011] UKUT 41 (IAC) (10 February 2011) Upper Tribunal: Being Iranian Arab does not itself generate risk of persecution upon return to Iran. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
“When freedom does not have a purpose, when it does not wish to know anything about the rule of law engraved in the hearts of men and women, when it does not listen to the voice of conscience, it turns against humanity and society. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
French privacy advocacy group La Quadrature du Net, non-profit Internet service provider French Data Network and its Federation FDN industry association have now challenged the adoption of the Privacy Shield pact by the European Commission at the Luxembourg-based General Court, following in the steps of Irish group Digital Rights Ireland. [read post]
