Search for: "Doe v. Hackler"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
., 56 USPQ2d 1220, 21 (TTAB 2000) (“Hackler” held to be a rare surname despite 1295 listings in phone directories). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
For a case that produced the opposite result see Mitchell Miller, a professional corporation, dba Miller Law Group, P.C. v. [read post]
