Search for: "Doe v. James Mattis"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Mattis, the case of a dual U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments over a preliminary injunction in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:53 am
General James Mattis, the US Secretary of... [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
One preliminary injunction does remain in place in Stone v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am
Trump, in the District of Maryland; Doe 2 v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 9:00 am
Trump, et al.; Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:44 am
As usual, they’re up on the sixth floor at Texas Law, bringing you the following this week: Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
In anticipation of Judge Chutkan’s ruling, Robert Chesney discussed whether the transfer of John Doe in Doe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:47 pm
To wit: Doe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
Mattis, Robert Chesney discussed whether the transfer of Doe might be prohibited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Valentine v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
After President Trump’s inauguration and an initial tweet by the president that called for a return to the ban, then-Secretary of Defense James Mattis coordinated a review of Carter’s changes. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am
Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared this week’s National Security Law Podcast, in which the two discuss President Trump’s treason remarks, the Nunes memo, military commissions, and the Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
And on the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck discussed the retirement of military commissions Judge Vance Spath, arguments in Doe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
In a remarkable turn in United States v. al-Nashiri, military judge Col. [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am
Circuit Court’s ruling in Doe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:28 am
Andrew Kent weighed in on Hernandez v. [read post]
