Search for: "Doe v. McMillan"
Results 1 - 20
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 11:07 am
Miller v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
In Bothwell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
In the recent decision of Orsoni v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 9:51 am
Class actions certifications in British Columbia have continued to surge for consumer claims arising from product liability, privacy breaches, misleading advertising, and price-fixing competition claims. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:29 am
Williams v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Overholding in Commercial Leasing appeared first on McMillan LLP. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
McMillan’s Competition Group will continue to provide updates as proposed changes to materialize. [1] The Prime Minister’s September 14th announcement also focused on other issues impacting the cost-of-living in Canada, which primarily related to introducing new measures to address the lack of affordable housing.[2] Bill C-56, An Act to Amend the Excise Tax Act and the Competition Act (First Reading – September 21, 2023).[3] The Government just made significant amendments… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 12:58 pm
However, in the case of Ghermezian v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:44 pm
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Director Liability: The Corporate Veil May Not Be Pierced, But It Will Not Protect You From An Oppression Remedy Claim appeared first on McMillan LLP. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
On August 1, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Secure v Commissioner of Competition,[1] upholding the Competition Tribunal’s order requiring Secure Energy Inc. to divest 29 facilities to remedy the anti-competitive effects in 136 markets in western Canada arising from its July 2021 acquisition of Tervita Corporation.[2] It provides important guidance on the standard to be met to establish an efficiencies defense under the Competition Act. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:21 pm
Applicable Test The Court applied the test set out in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (the “BCE Decision”) to determine if the proposed Arrangement should be approved. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:01 am
The policy paper identifies five key principles: (i) safety, security and robustness, (ii) appropriate transparency and explainability, (iii) fairness, (iv) accountability and governance, and (v) contestability and redress. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:56 pm
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post A “Thumbs-Up” to Emojis in Contract Interpretation: Applicability of the <i>South West</i> Decision to British Columbia appeared first on McMillan LLP. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Singular Belief on Vaccination Is Not Discrimination appeared first on McMillan LLP. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:44 am
In DNR Restoration Inc. v Trac Developments Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 10:58 am
appeared first on McMillan LLP. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:37 am
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Arbitrator’s “Mind of His Own” Results in Procedural Unfairness: <i>Mattamy (Downsview) Limited v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:59 am
In The Fifth Wall Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:47 am
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Canadian Patent Law Update: Declarations, Limitation Periods, and General Releases appeared first on McMillan LLP. [read post]
