Search for: "Doe v. Mercer" Results 1 - 20 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:25 am by Michael L. Saile, Jr., Esq.
The Superior Court ruled against the Mercer County NJ prosecutor by stating that the 20-minute observation rule was required by State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
  Nonetheless, I had to gasp for a second when I read the release associated with a Mercer County Superior Court judge's decision in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
how much time should you devote to DoE? [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:03 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Over on the main page, Dennis has written up GS CleanTech Corp. and Cantor Colburn LLP v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:30 am by David Ashmore and Jonathan Lord
While most in England are debating whether it should be Ivan Toney or Ollie Watkins as first-choice deputy for Harry Kane, in the employment law world we have been focusing on the strikers at the heart of an important new Supreme Court decision in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:30 am by PaulKostro
RONALD TUSCANO, individually; NORTHEASTERN IMPORT-EXPORT, CORP., a Delaware Corporation, Jacobson, Mary C., P.J.Ch., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: The New Jersey Supreme Court addressed issue preclusion in Watkins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:53 am by Garrett Hinck
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
The RIAA has finally dropped its longstanding case against disabled single mother Tanya Andersen in Oregon, Atlantic v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:01 pm by David Krenkel
An exception to the Law Against Discrimination which allows a company to refuse to hire septuagenarians -- does not apply to contract nonrenewals, the Court held in Nini v. [read post]