Search for: "Doe v. Pak" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 22 Misc 3d 1117(A)Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his position effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:12 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 22 Misc 3d 1117(A)Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his position effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:22 am by Mark Summerfield
Enviro Pak Pty Ltd v New Horticulture Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 306 (2 April 2013)Enviro Pak Pty Ltd v New Horticulture Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 624 (25 June 2013)It is not common for the Federal Court of Australia to allow a corporation to be represented by a non-lawyer. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50154(U), Decided on February 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Kings County, Justice Martin Schneier [not officially reported]Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his postion effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a DJ action, infringement under DOE was found, which was affirmed by the CAFC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Carbone v Whidden, 2015 ABCA 161 [14] However, this maze of affidavits does prove two things. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
PAK Foods filed a motion to compel arbitration which was denied by the trial court. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
Defendant: Nice-Pak Products, Inc., DOES Case Number: 2:2008cv01368 Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]