Search for: "Doe v. Pak"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Houdek v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:57 am
Pixley v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Pixley v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 22 Misc 3d 1117(A)Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his position effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:12 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 22 Misc 3d 1117(A)Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his position effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
For these reasons, we hold that res judicata does not bar the Plaintiffs’ retaliation claim against Pak. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:23 am
by Dennis Crouch Plas-Pak Indus v Sulzer Mixpac (Fed. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50154(U), Decided on February 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Kings County, Justice Martin Schneier [not officially reported]Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his postion effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 1:48 pm
In Moore, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm
In a DJ action, infringement under DOE was found, which was affirmed by the CAFC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:00 am
Carbone v Whidden, 2015 ABCA 161 [14] However, this maze of affidavits does prove two things. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 8:43 am
This is exactly what happened in the recent case of Doe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 10:00 am
One illustrative case is that of Pak v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:05 am
Hong, Overturning Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm
Grip-Pak, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:20 am
” A similar finding was made in Birgit Rausing, AB Tetra Pak v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:15 pm
It's Missett v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Dart Industries, Inc. (1981) 29 Cal.3d 462, 471; Cal Pak Delivery, Inc. v. [read post]
