Search for: "Doe v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 82,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
         In the case of United States of American v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
         In the case of United States of American v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm by Josh Blackman
You stated the Supreme Court would have the final word as far as the lower courts are concerned. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm by Jana Grauberger and Stephen Wiegand
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS lease production… [read post]
Since his criminal conviction did not specify whether he was convicted of a crime with a mental state element, Pereida’s conviction does not fall under CIMT. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a decision of the district court that granted summary judgment to Lotte International America Corp. because Ezaki Glico’s cookie design was functional and not entitled to trade dress protection in Kaisha v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a decision of the district court that granted summary judgment to Lotte International America Corp. because Ezaki Glico’s cookie design was functional and not entitled to trade dress protection in Kaisha v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Janine Regan (UK)
 In particular, the UK Government referred to: (1) Article 4(2) in the Treaty of the European Union (TEU) which states that “national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State”; and (2) Article 1(3) of the ePrivacy Directive which states that the ePrivacy Directive “does not apply to activities that fall outside of the TEU…such as…activities concerning public security, defence, State… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:40 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Randolph J. May
One does not have to reach back into ancient history to find such cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Doe, 19-1108Issue: Whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]