Search for: "Doe v. State Ethics Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
State Ethics Commission is not required to show an individual knowing and intentional engaged in prohibited post-public employment conductMatter of Gormley v New York State Ethics Commn., 2008 NY Slip Op 09245, decided on November 24, 2008, Court of AppealsThe issue before the Court of Appeals: Does Public Officers Law §73(18) required the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that an… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:26 pm by slkimbro
Most lawyers who have researched ethics opinions related to online advertising are familiar with the Total Attorneys ethics matter, which began in April, 2009 when a single Connecticut lawyer filed an ethics complaint with the state bar disciplinary counsel in 47 states. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by David Houck
On Nov. 17, 2017, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened for the purpose of receiving testimony from Professor Ellen Yaroshefsky, an ethics advisor to defendant’s learned counsel Richard Kammen, who had previously resigned over undisclosed ethics concerns. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:09 am by George
For example the ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1 states that “a lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer’s services. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
” Ryan cited US v Bruce as standing for the proposition that “violation of an ethical obligation does not in and of itself give rise to a conflict of interest unless it involves the attorney putting his own interests in conflict with his client’s. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Adira Levine
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down its decision in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]