Search for: "Doe v. Teamsters Local Union" Results 41 - 60 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 8:44 am by Lukas Moffett and Kurt G. Larkin
(the “Employer”) and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 631 (the “Union”), the Union grieved the Employer’s use of subcontractors to perform certain warehouse and event services work. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Conflict of interestPeterson v Corbin, 275 AD2d 35*Gregory P. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 12:04 pm
Plaintiffs were union members represented by the Chino Valley Products Dairy and Teamsters Local Number 63. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am by Paul Levy
  Back in the 1990's, Ellis Boal, one of the pioneers of union democracy litigation when he was the original lead counsel for Teamsters for a Democratic Union, persuaded a court to rule in Clark v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
Teamsters Local 525 (alleging Arbitrator exceeded his authority when he reinstated an employee despite finding that the Company had "serious just cause" as set forth in the cba) and Securiguard, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:10 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Teamsters Local Union 847 v Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment In Teamsters Local Union 847 v Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, 2019 CanLII 95328 (ON LA) (“Teamsters”), a labour arbitrator upheld an employer’s dismissal of a part-time employee for cause because of her breach of its absentee policy. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm by Joy Waltemath
In the past year, San Leandro, California-based Teamsters Local 853 has organized hundreds of tech company drivers in Silicon Valley, adding to the union’s 1.4 million members in the U.S. and Canada. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:43 pm by MEL
For more information, see Teamsters Local Union No. 31 v Purolator Canada Inc., 2023 CanLII 120937 (CA LA) If you wish to make sure your policies will be upheld in an ever-changing workplace, Minken Employment Lawyers can navigate you through this evolving landscape. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:46 am
”The Appellate Division modified the lower court’s ruling, holding that Supreme Court was correct with respect Ambrosino’s claims based on “breach of contract,” but reinstated his petition with respect to his allegations of unlawful discrimination in employment.The court explained that with respect to “breach of contract,” the collective bargaining agreement between the Village and Ambrosino’s union, the International Brotherhood of… [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
"The Appellate Division modified the lower court's ruling, holding that Supreme Court was correct with respect Ambrosino's claims based on "breach of contract," but reinstated his petition with respect to his allegations of unlawful discrimination in employment.The court explained that with respect to "breach of contract," the collective bargaining agreement between the Village and Ambrosino's union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondents International Brotherhood of Teamsters Brief in opposition of respondent Teamsters Local 287 Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Center on National Labor Policy, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Although Teamsters Local 117 appeared to be lurking, the union apparently had not expressly set its sights on these driver coordinators yet. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 245; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1), (3), (4), and (5). [read post]