Search for: "Doe v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 41,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Drake, M.D., today (June 24) issued the following statement on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:20 pm by Benjamin Pollard
The United States repatriated Assadullah Haroon Gul, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, writes the New York Times. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:32 am
 As you have undoubtedly heard by now, on June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:54 am by Sara Savat
That argument does not engage with the right to privacy, which has long generated controversy, or other aspects of Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:42 am by Jeff Welty
Ever since the Supreme Court of the United State decided NCAA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by Amy Howe
The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
Subsequently, harder, thematic due diligence requirements have taken form through new measures on forced labour in the United States, legislation on child labour and conflict minerals due diligence passed in Switzerland, and proposals for EU batteries and deforestation regulations. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So where does this tendency come from? [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Karen K. Hartford
This post addresses the PCORI fee obligations of plan sponsors with respect to self-insured health plans and does not address the PCORI fee obligations of insurers with respect to fully-insured health plans. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
” Moore argues that unlike other constitutional provisions, the clause does not refer to the state itself, but a particular institution of government. [read post]