Search for: "Doe v. Watson" Results 81 - 100 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Watson that s. 31 of the FLA violated the child’s s. 15 Charter rights and could not be saved by s. 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am by Aurora Barnes
Maryland does not apply to impeachment evidence when the Supreme Court has held that Brady does apply to impeachment evidence. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Maryland does not apply to impeachment evidence when the Supreme Court has held that Brady does apply to impeachment evidence. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Watson says that during a routine cell search, another corrections officer examined Watson’s radio, which had a loose antenna that was held on with tape; Watson alleges that, in examining the radio, the officer broke the antenna. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Aurora Barnes
Maryland does not apply to impeachment evidence when the Supreme Court has held that Brady does apply to impeachment evidence. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Quinta Jurecic
’” All these opinions rely heavily on McCreary County v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Orin Kerr
Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 416 (1976), and the absence of a “clear, controlling case explicitly stating that the government may not obtain real-time cell site location data under the SCA,” United States v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:04 am by John Diekman
Practice point: Article 31 is not a statute specifically exempting public records from disclosure under FOIL, and FOIL does not bar the simultaneous use of both CPLR 3101 and FOIL in order to procure discovery.Case in point:  Smith v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The Zelo Street blog does not pull its punches in a post entitled “Tory Internet Regulation Hypocrisy”. [read post]