Search for: "Does 1 - 10" Results 361 - 380 of 43,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 4:50 pm by Jon Sands
First, No. 11-30346 (10-1-13) (Paez with Ripple and Trott). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover, the fact that in claim 1 the pull-off opening means, the frame and the cap are listed as three distinct elements does not exclude that these elements may be interconnected with each other or even that they may be integral with each other. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Jonathan J. Russell
The new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“2017 Tax Cuts Act”) P.L. 115-97, doubled the Estate and Gift tax “Applicable Exclusion Amount,” from $5 million to $10 million, for gifts made, and estates of decedents dying, after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
The Temple Law Review hosts a symposium today on Taxpayer Rights in the United States: All the Angles: Panel #1: The Federal TBOR – What Does it Mean, and What Can it Do? [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:00 am
This requirement does not apply to smoke alarms that have been ordered by, or are in the inventory of, an owner, managing agent, contractor, wholesaler, or retailer on or before July 1, 2014, until July 1, 2015. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:16 pm
Another question is does legal work fall into the 10% GFE threshold? [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:37 am by David S. Jones
Citizenship and Immigration Services has announced that as of January 1, 2015, in accordance with the National Archives and Records Administration records retention and disposal schedule, it will begin permanently disposing E-Verify records that are more than 10 years old, including all activity recorded in an employer’s E-Verify profile. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:27 pm
The international research shows that the death penalty does not have any proven deterrent effect. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
The fact that a claim can be interpreted in a broad way does not make it unclear. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
The post Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:16 am
A year from now we can decide where these predictions stand on a scale from 1 to 10, 1 being a total failure to grasp reality, and 10 being worthy of Nostradamus. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:52 pm by Patent Docs
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al. 3:10-cv-02649; filed December 22, 2010 in the Southern District of California • Plaintiff: Salk Institute for Biological Studies • Defendants: Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Ferring Research Institute, Inc; Ferring International Center S.A.; Ferring B.V.; Ferring A.B.; Frederick Paulsen, Jr; DOES 1 through 10 Correction of inventorship of U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Karkhanis (slides showing application of 112(f) as Lemley suggests to 10 PAE patents and 20 control patents)A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents, by Mark A. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:42 pm
RESPA's Section 10 does not require that all loans have an escrow account, instead it regulates the maximum amount of money that can be deposited into an escrow account. [read post]