Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 141 - 160 of 36,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
In Jameel v Dow Jones at [32] –4 [41] a challenge to the presumption of damage as incompatible with article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights was rejected by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:03 am
Does 1-16, a "John Doe" case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued a stay of the RIAA subpoena and all proceedings during the pendency of John Doe #3's appeal.This is a case in which several John Does had moved to quash the subpoena, vacate the ex parte discovery order, and dismiss the complaint.The motion to vacate, quash, and dismiss, was based on a… [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 6:45 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
  Not only does OSHA set and enforce workplace safety and health standards, OSHA will provide assistance and training to employers when requested. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:47 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from In The Matter of the Estate of LEIGH CAMERON RANDALL, CHANCERY DIVISION, PROBATE PART, ESX-CP-0199-10, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., February 1, 2011: N.J.S.A. §3B:3-2 requires that a will shall be in writing signed by the testator or by another at the testator’s direction, and signed by two witnesses within a reasonable time after witnessing testator’s signature or testator’s acknowledgement of that signature. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:58 am by PaulKostro
A-0834-17T1, December 10, 2018: Rule 4:28-1(a) provides that: A person who is subject to service of process shall be joined as a party to the action if (1) in the person’s absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties, or (2) the person claims an interest in the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in the person’s absence may either (i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person’s… [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-47, the Court has departed from its earlier authority, and granted a motion to sever and dismiss. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:26 am by Seth Jaffe
  The rule explicitly states that, whether:  (1) no corrections are suggested; (2) corrections are suggested but rejected; or (3) corrections are suggested and accepted, DOE “will” publish the rule in the Federal Register. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Over the past 10 years, GAO and others have repeatedly made recommendations for DOE to improve safety performance. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
That extra clause is a “quasi-extension” of the period; it does not change its nature, i.e. that of a time limit for performing a specific action. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
Does 1-11, the RIAA's ex parte discovery suit against Oklahoma State University students, the RIAA has filed papers opposing the students' motion to strike.RIAA's Opposition to Motion to Strike** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright online law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:46 pm by Jim Eagar
Mistake #1 – Dying Intestate Statistics show that only 4 out of every 10 Americans do any estate planning at all.   [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 3:32 pm by Dana
Shultz, Attorney at Law +1 510-547-0545 dana [at] danashultz [dot] comThis blog does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by John N. Davis
The U.K. legislation doesn’t use the expression “subject-matter or activities” here, but article 52 (epo.org) of the European Patent Convention does. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Strainis-Walker One of the questions we are most frequently asked by small employers is about the so-called “Rule of 10”; i.e., the long-perpetuated myth that OSHA does not have jurisdiction over employers or workplaces with fewer than 10 employees. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Strainis-Walker One of the questions we are most frequently asked by small employers is about the so-called “Rule of 10”; i.e., the long-perpetuated myth that OSHA does not have jurisdiction over employers or workplaces with fewer than 10 employees. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Strainis-Walker One of the questions we are most frequently asked by small employers is about the so-called “Rule of 10”; i.e., the long-perpetuated myth that OSHA does not have jurisdiction over employers or workplaces with fewer than 10 employees. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Strainis-Walker One of the questions we are most frequently asked by small employers is about the so-called “Rule of 10”; i.e., the long-perpetuated myth that OSHA does not have jurisdiction over employers or workplaces with fewer than 10 employees. [read post]