Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 201 - 220 of 41,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2017, 7:05 pm by Cordisco & Saile Web Team
L.1986, c. 39 (C.12:7-57) at any time within 90 days after the commission of the offense; and for a violation of R.S.39:3-40, or section 1 of P.L.1942, c. 192 (C.39:4-128.1), at any time within 90 days after the commission of the offense.c. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:22 am by admin
Lawyers may require a minimum of 1/6 an hour of work and may start recording for every 1/10 an hour. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This decision contains some interesting paragraphs on the admissibility of a third party intervention.[1.1] With letters of 10 and 15 August 2012 Bericap GmbH&Co. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
If the court finds that maintenance is inappropriate, it does not matter how long you were married, there will be no maintenance awarded. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm by Jake Ward
JW Note:  Yes, dear readers, the term “HE” does stand for “high explosive”, and numeral “10”  in the figure refers to meat. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm by Patent Docs
• Defendants: Cellsight Technologies, Inc.; Does 1-50 Infringement of U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
The requested “correction” has already been carried out in claim 1 according to the main request and the auxiliary requests 1 to 3 and 5.[2.1] However, neither R 139 nor R 140 allow for a “correction” of the granted patent as desired by the [patent proprietor] (see G 1/10 [order, as well as point 1 and points 10 and 11 of the reasons in connection with point VII.2 of the summary of facts and submissions]. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Given that the committee does not meet in the summer, an election call in the fall would kill Bill C-10. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Given that the committee does not meet in the summer, an election call in the fall would kill Bill C-10. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:30 pm by Venkat
[Post by Venkat] Shlahtichman v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Case No. 09-4073 (7th Cir.; Aug. 10, 2010) The Seventh Circuit recently concluded that the words "electronically printed," as used in the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, does not include a computer generated email receipt sent by a merchant. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
Here is my third annual list of the top 10 e-discovery developments and trends from the past year. 1. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:13 am by Benjamin Justus
Does 1-30 Filed: 10/19/2016Case No. 2:16-cv-01071 LHF Productions, Inc. v. [read post]