Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 401 - 420 of 41,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The addition of the policy statement is driven in part by the OCC’s determination that the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual does not adequately describe “all of the OCC’s considerations regarding the BMA statutory factors and its related processes such as considerations for holding public meetings. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
" (And odd comments given that the Sinecure Clause does not use "chosen" at all. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:12 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
How can you apply for it, and what does life in South Korea look like? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First of all, they are insufficient, particularly for those of us who approach The Collaborative Constitution wondering why it is that her work does not reserve a major role for "We the People" (this is to say, why it does no reserve a major role for the authors of the Constitution, and the “demos” referred to in the very idea of “democracy”). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:34 am by Kelly Shivery
  If a whistleblower’s tip results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million, the whistleblower may receive an award between 10% and 30% of the total monetary sanctions collected. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
" (as contested by the merits briefs and numerous amici).(3) Does the oath of office of the President, as set forth in Article II, Section 1, to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" count as an oath "to support the Constitution of the United States," as set forth in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith Ervine
Finally, it clarifies that, for any such subsidiary that does not file an annual report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F or Form 40-F, there would be no need to file the clawback policy as an exhibit. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Judge Moukawsher stated that, "[b]ased upon what has occurred on the record in connection with the latest motion to disqualify Judge Adelman, on January 10, 2022, at 10 a.m. the court will hold a hearing on whether to act against Attorney Cunha, and, if action is warranted, what action to take. [read post]
  The CNIL, however, is more specific on this point in step 1 of its draft guide. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:58 am by Courtney Finerty-Stelzner
  United States Attorney Damian Williams announced SDNY’s Whistleblower Pilot Program (the “Program”) on January 10, 2024. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Madison's terms, expressed in the famous Federalist Papers n. 10, the republican government was established so as to "refine and enlarge public opinions, by passing thdem through the medium of a chosen body of citizens. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Damon Duncan
Frequently Asked Questions About Chapter 13 Bankruptcy 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Stephanie Rossello
Blogpost 10/2024 INTRODUCTION For those looking for more guidance by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the meaning of “personal data” and, in particular, the notion of an “indirectly identifiable” natural person under article 4(1) GDPR, 2023 has been an exceptionally gratifying year. [read post]