Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 641 - 660
of 37,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
9.Jurisdiction; determination.a.A court of this State has jurisdiction to declare a person incapacitated and appoint a guardian or issue a protective order for a respondent if:(1)This State is the respondent's home state as defined in section 3 of P.L.2012, c.36 (C.3B:12B-3); or(2)On the date the petition is filed, this State is a significant-connection state, as defined in section 3 of P.L.2012, c.36 (C.3B:12B-3) and determined in accordance with section 10 of P.L.2012, c.36… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
That extra clause is a “quasi-extension” of the period; it does not change its nature, i.e. that of a time limit for performing a specific action. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:25 am
It then came to the preliminary conclusion that claim 1 of the patent and claim 1 of auxiliary requests 1 to 8 and 10 did not comply with Article 76(1) EPC. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Borak,[1] however, the Supreme Court implied a private right of action from the statute. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Preferably; the average particle diameter of the fine granules is 300 to 400 μm.Overall, the Federal Circuit found that “[n]owhere does the specification suggest that an average particle size greater than 400 μm (even within 10% of that figure) could achieve the inventive result of avoiding a feeling of roughness in the mouth. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:59 pm
1. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:45 am
A copy of the First Department's December 1, 2009 decision can be found here.Select insured the plaintiff under a Mutual Fund and Directors and Officers Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance Policy issued by Select with a policy limit of $10 million. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:12 am
Leal-Felix, No. 09-50426 (11-1-10) (Goodwin with Rawlison; dissent by Bennett, D.J., N. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:30 am
Judge Dyk’s dissenting opinion in this case explains that “[t]he only material difference between [Chemours] claim 1 and Kaulbach is that Kaulbach discloses (in Sample A11) a melt flow rate of 24 g/10 min, slightly lower than 27 g/10 min, the lower bound of the 30 ± 3 g/10 min rate claimed in claim 1 of the ’609 patent. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:04 am
It went up at 1:13 a.m. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Point 1 is run under s. 10(1) Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994) i.e. a double identity infringement claim. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:42 am
On March 10, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Klooster v City of Charlevoix. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:08 pm
For a free, confidential, detailed evaluation with a motorcycle lawyer, please call Ledger & Associates @ 1-800-300-0001 or visit the firm’s website for more information @ www.ledgerlaw.com. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:45 pm
Does 1-100, 2010 WL 3923880 (D. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:33 am
To help you better prepare an O-1 visa petition, we are now sharing our experience and provide you the following 10 most important points that need to be addressed when preparing your case: I. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:30 am
Id. at 1. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
It does not affect only Quebec. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The Examining Division (ED) had refused the application as contrary to A 53(c).Claims 1 and 10 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:40 am
Here are some items to consider: 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The court referred to 9 letters, but the record contains 10. [read post]
