Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 661 - 680
of 37,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
9.Jurisdiction; determination.a.A court of this State has jurisdiction to declare a person incapacitated and appoint a guardian or issue a protective order for a respondent if:(1)This State is the respondent's home state as defined in section 3 of P.L.2012, c.36 (C.3B:12B-3); or(2)On the date the petition is filed, this State is a significant-connection state, as defined in section 3 of P.L.2012, c.36 (C.3B:12B-3) and determined in accordance with section 10 of P.L.2012, c.36… [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 6:15 pm
However, if a firm's Web site goes further and specifically requests or invites the visitor to submit information "without clear and reasonably understandable warnings and cautionary statements that limit the lawyer's obligations,” then a submission "likely” will constitute a consultation and establish a prospective client relationship.ABA Formal Opinion 10-467 (here), suggests that a Web site disclaimer warn visitors that (1) sending information… [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:30 am
Judge Dyk’s dissenting opinion in this case explains that “[t]he only material difference between [Chemours] claim 1 and Kaulbach is that Kaulbach discloses (in Sample A11) a melt flow rate of 24 g/10 min, slightly lower than 27 g/10 min, the lower bound of the 30 ± 3 g/10 min rate claimed in claim 1 of the ’609 patent. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Question #1 – Unlawful Presence in USA I cannot remember the specifics regarding unlawful presence towards the 3 yr and 10 yr bars, can you provide those time periods? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:56 am
Subsection 4.1(2) states that, despite subsection 4.1(1), the Act applies in respect of a user-uploaded program if the program meets one of two preconditions. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Preferably; the average particle diameter of the fine granules is 300 to 400 μm.Overall, the Federal Circuit found that “[n]owhere does the specification suggest that an average particle size greater than 400 μm (even within 10% of that figure) could achieve the inventive result of avoiding a feeling of roughness in the mouth. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:42 am
On March 10, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Klooster v City of Charlevoix. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The court referred to 9 letters, but the record contains 10. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
§ 507(a)(1)(A) and a nondischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:31 am
For example, if you conduct a terms and connectors search on Docket Alarm such as “parody w/10 (copyright or trademark) and is:opinion”, you can click the “Track this Search” button and automatically receive an update any time a new court opinion issues matching the query. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Point 1 is run under s. 10(1) Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994) i.e. a double identity infringement claim. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:34 am
Does it depend if they already sit on prominent boards? [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm
Facilitating, encouraging, offering or soliciting sexual conduct with a minor by use of technology 10. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:26 pm
This does beg the question as to whether claimant solicitors, particularly in high value claims, would be negligent to settle claims prior to that date. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:15 am
Decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal can be persuasive in the Patents Court.What does “persuasive” really mean in practice? [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:19 am
Does that qualify for compensation under the guarantee? [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The Examining Division (ED) had refused the application as contrary to A 53(c).Claims 1 and 10 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:20 am
$675 FOR A ST LOUIS CHAPTER 7 The short answer is: ten (10) years. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
§§78m(a)(1), 78l(b)(1). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Here’s the results from our recent survey on board approval of the 10-K: 1. [read post]
