Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 61 - 80
of 41,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 4:22 am
Consequently, we do not sustain the rejection of claim19.The final tallyWe affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 1-4, 6, 8, 10-13,15-17, and 20, and we reverse the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 5 and19. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 2:19 pm
§ 841(b)(1)(B)(vi) — requiring a 5-year minimum sentence where the offense involved “10 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of any analogue of” fentanyl — even if it does not qualify as a “controlled substance analogue” under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm
% yes Proposition 82.88% 1 57.77% 5 57.31% 9 55.94% 10 54.52% 3 51.57% 6 51.52% 2 48.30% 7 47.00% 8 40.28% 4 [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Does 1–65, 2010 WL 4055667 (U.S. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
John Does 1-10, supra. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
§ 1326(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(2).HELD: Drugging by surreptitious means does not involve use of physical force. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:54 am
Does 1-300, No. 10 C 6255, Slip Op. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:28 am
§ § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C).HELD: Admission of statements made by coconspirators during course of conspiracy and in furtherance of conspiracy does not violate Confrontation Clause. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:21 am
Does 1-10, filed Aug. 24, 2007 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
However, we found the impact was less significant than even the word count of claim 1 – only a 10% contribution to the overall weighting. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:47 am
Signing a birth certificate, alone, does not establish paternity in Oklahoma. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:19 am
Does your Rhode Island divorce have to be difficult? [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:49 pm
This is one of the reasons Form 10 shells are much less expensive to acquire than an OTCBB shell. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:55 am
” The Supreme Court has developed a three-part Contracts Clause test: (1) does the state law operate as a substantial impairment of the contractual relationship; (2) if so, does the state have a significant, […] [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:56 am
Does 1-55, No. 114 C 10, Slip Op. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:41 am
” The Supreme Court has developed a three-part Contract Clause test: (1) does the state law operate as a substantial impairment of the contractual relationship; (2) if so, does the state have a significant, […] [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:24 am
” The Supreme Court has developed a three-part Contracts Clause test: (1) does the state law operate as a substantial impairment of the contractual relationship; (2) if so, does the state […] [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
In August, DOE announced its intention to fund FutureGen 2.0 as part of an integrated strategy to repower America's coal industry [See WIMS 8/20/10]. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:47 am
Law Lessons from In The Matter of the Estate of LEIGH CAMERON RANDALL, CHANCERY DIVISION, PROBATE PART, ESX-CP-0199-10, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., February 1, 2011: N.J.S.A. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm
Does Ochocinco tweet too much? [read post]
