Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 961 - 980 of 37,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Howey, setting forth the test for what constitutes an “investment contract,” and therefore a security, for purposes of the federal securities laws.[9] The Court explained that Congress intended “investment contract” to apply broadly to a variety of situations in which individuals invested money in a common enterprise with the expectation that they would earn a profit through the efforts of others.[10] This approach “embodie[d] a flexible rather than a static… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:25 am by Joanna Herzik
Update 7/10/2024: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm by Andrew Vey
Simply because a term is new does not mean it will confer anything of value. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
It then offers the recent efforts of Vietnam to invest in a comprehensive regulation of tech and AI for consideration as an example. 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:54 am by Dennis Crouch
  The paper does not appear to identify particular harms caused by that approach, but note that the patent laws of those jurisdiction are limited in other ways that potentially protect against the harm. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:42 am by Angelina Kushnarova
Market Need: If the idea does not address a real need, it won’t gain traction. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 6:00 pm by Simmons Hanly Conroy
It’s a record that still stands today — as does John’s founding mission to put clients first. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:56 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
To codify the framework set out in Gerety into statutory law under N.J.S.A. 10:5-8, -12 and -18, the DCR has proposed the enactment of N.J.A.C. 13:16-1, et. seq. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 6:54 am by Dan Bressler
For example, if it is determined that the complaint does not allege conduct that, if true, would violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, it will be dismissed without notice to the attorney. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
If all prior awards include body parts and systems that are labeled in the Labor Code § 4664(c)(1)(G) category ( i.e., miscellaneous), then applicant would only be entitled to a 10% award of PD for the bulk of his CT related disability. [read post]