Search for: "Does 1-10 through 10, inclusive"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Saying that a tail is a leg does not make it a leg. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
None of the pending appeals before the UPC appears to deal with this exception, and yet most of the appeals have not added 2 TQJs to the 3 LQJs to obtain a 5-judge panel under Article 9(1).This question of the composition of Court of Appeal panels does not seem to have been bluntly disregarded by the UPC. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
Copyright Office 512 Study, April 1, 2016: Question 16. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:48 am
The SEC has said these exceptions should be sparingly, but when FINRA examined the short sales that took place through UBS from June 1, 2006 to August 31, 2006, it discovered that about 700,000 of them were without locates as a result of improper application of Reg SHO exceptions. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
Seven under Section 4(1)(a) relating to national security, three under Section 4(1)(b) relating to courts, two under Section 4(1)(c) relating to Parliament and State Legislatures, three under Section 4(1)(d) relating to trade secrets and intellectual property rights, one each under Sections 4(1)(e) and (f) relating to fiduciary relationships and foreign relations, six under Section 4(1)(g) relating to law enforcement, three under Section… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
This is the (final) decision in the case that led to decision G 2/10 of the Enlarged Board (EBA)Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
"According to the judge, Playboy failed to demonstrate convincingly that Boing Boing has supported the infringement through inducement or material contribution. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 11:56 am
The EU does not have and never had any such formality requirements, much like with copyright registration. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 7:11 am
We’re doing 6-10 today and 1-5 tomorrow. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:15 am
Decisions regarding inclusion in the workshop program will be sent by 15 May, 2015. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:43 am
In particular, paragraph 10 of the decision at Sharm el-Sheikh states that the framework “may” take into consideration a rather long list of specifically identified elements, but does not limit the framework to those elements. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
For a large tax haven, this ratio is 1:3, and for a small haven, it is 1:12. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:56 am
We will accept proposals for research papers of 10-12K words as well as shorter Think Pieces of 5-7K words.The deadline for the abstracts is 1 November 2019. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:57 am
"pic.twitter.com/4Ai31PrSXD— Justice Don Willett (@JusticeWillett) November 12, 2016(Here's a non-tongue-in-cheek question, just for fun): Does your inclusion of "#SCOTUS" in this tweet indicate that you would vote in favor of granting certiorari to this case or to a similar case? [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 5:27 pm
So where does that leave Levandowski? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:24 am
An additional benefit is that such conveyancing does not involve the emotional strains of a buyer and seller. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 7:10 am
For example, it is stated in section 17(1) of the Ontario Arbitration Act, 1991. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm
They could require the inclusion of a California choice of law provision. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
These acts or remarks are punishable by law and the fact that they were made using a virtual channel does not make less punishable those who committed them and whose case made be tried by courts. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
These acts or remarks are punishable by law and the fact that they were made using a virtual channel does not make less punishable those who committed them and whose case made be tried by courts. [read post]
