Search for: "Does 1-1000"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
I, § 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Further: “Article 9 does not authorise any restriction whatsoever on freedom of thought and conscience or on the freedom to have or to adopt the religion or belief of one’s choice. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
”[1] We’ve all taken tough positions: Beatles vs. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
If the property stolen is valued below $2,000, then it is a Class 1 misdemeanor, which can lead to a ear in jail, probation, and fines up to $1000. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
App. 3d at 1000-01. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
But the context is really simple: 1 name, 1 skater. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
And it does seem as though … there's no particular reason, and you can think of lots of reasons for the contrary. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Consistent with its 2023 policy, Glass Lewis will generally recommend voting against the governance committee chair at a Russell 1000 company that does not explicitly disclose the board’s role in oversight of E&S issues. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Consistent with its 2023 policy, Glass Lewis will generally recommend voting against the governance committee chair at a Russell 1000 company that does not explicitly disclose the board’s role in oversight of E&S issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
This 1000-to-1 ratio, the Court held, could not be justified even considering the extent to which the defendant had engaged in egregious conduct. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
”[5] Figure 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely: He didn’t devote any space to it.[1] His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:10 pm
So what does it mean to stay in your lane? [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Secondly, s.1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 means that claimants now have to prove that the publication caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:24 am
Search fee in respect of – a European or supplementary European search on an application filed on or after 1 July 2005 1390 1460 1520 60 4.1% – a European or supplementary European search on an application filed before 1 July 2005 950 1000 1040 40 4.0% – an international search 1775 1775 1845 70 3.9% – a supplementary international search 1775 1775 1845 70 3.9% 3. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
Under s.1(1) if a publication does not cause, or is not likely to cause, serious harm to reputation it is not defamatory. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:17 am
There thus does not ne [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:06 am
Since 2007 several Circuits have reviewed this argument and each has explained that the provision for statutory damages does not require a showing of “actual damages. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
How Does Chelation Therapy Work? [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 11:16 am
Liability does not stop with paying fines and/or penalties to the FTC. [read post]
