Search for: "Does 1-2" Results 81 - 100 of 107,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
Alan Dershowitz filed a motion to intervene in the victims rights lawsuit of Jane Does 1, 2 and 3 today. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:07 am by Brian Leiter
I was invited to participate in the discussion, I surmise, because (1) I have a blog, and (2) I am a big... [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:15 am by PaulKostro
., A-3674-10T1, July 2, 2012: N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2(c)(1) defines sexual assault as an act of sexual penetration in which “[t]he actor uses physical force or coercion, but the victim does not sustain severe personal injury. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The ’418 patent,filed on January 23, 1989 and issued on June 6, 2006,covers compounds consisting of Yttrium, Barium, Copper,and Oxygen, assembled according to a 2-1-4 ratio ofYttrium to Barium to Copper. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:35 am by Docket Navigator
[M]erely being cumulative of other prior art does not invoke § 315(e)(2) estoppel. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Juan Rivera throws behind the runner Russell Martin on second following a single and gets the last out of a 2-1 game in the top of the ninth in a game won by the Angels over the Dodgers on 24 June 2010.But was Martin really out? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:56 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
The FOAs focused in three major areas: (1) Building Energy Efficiency Frontiers & Innovation Technologies; (2) Solid State Lighting; and (3) Building America. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 2:54 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
      (2) An effective disclaimer meeting the requirements of subsection (1) constitutes constructive notice to all persons from the time of filing. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:11 am by Jay Fishman
After January 1, 2011, registrants may file an annual updating amendment on new Part 2 instead of on old PartII since an annual updating amendment is not required in Texas.Please see http://www.ssb.state.tx.us/ [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
Court of Appeals by a 2-1 vote concluded the original law’s key funding mechanism ... was properly eliminated by Congress and therefore the entire law could not be enforced. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
In Part 1 of this blog, I examine a recent decision by a Canadian judge and in Part 2, new legislation in Alaska, which together make this topic more relevant than ever. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark BLACK FLEECE in standard character form, for various clothing items "not made of fleece fabric," finding the mark to be deceptively misdescriptive under Section 2(e)(1) and lacking in acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
In a rare unillustrated opinion authored by Judge Bucher, the Board reversed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark BANANA CHAIR, finding it not merely descriptive of "furniture, chair. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: when does the fact that the alleged infringement is occuring become known? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
It is, therefore, time to consider a Part 1 and Part 2 of a proxy statement, much the way the Commission already divides registration statements. [read post]