Search for: "Does 1-45"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 7:26 am
Courts generally treat a constructive discharge like a firing.When does a claim like that accrue (triggering the 45-day period)? [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 10:58 am
I need to make my own list of UW tips:1. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
Does your company require executives to comply with HSR filing requirements upon acquiring company shares: - Yes, and they have been for a while - 39% - Yes, but only recently because of this enforcement action - 16% - No - 45% 2. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Id. at (b)(1) & (2). [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
Thursday 3/27** - 12:45 p.m. - Room 231 (45 mins) Tuesday 4/1 - 1:00 p.m. - Room 231 (30 mins) PREPARE TO PRACTICE FOR LITIGATORS! [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 12:36 pm
On August 17, 2022, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed class counsel’s appeal of Chief Justice Crampton’s decision at the Federal Court of Canada striking out a putative class action claim relating to minor hockey.[1] This decision represents a clear victory for Hockey Canada[2] and the CHL defendants, and reinforces the widely understood interpretation of key provisions under the Competition Act, namely that: (i) the prohibition on anti-competitive arrangements in section… [read post]
31 May 2019, 1:30 am
David Bennahum, MD, Institute for Ethics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 9:15 – 9 30 AM Body Modifications for Gender expression and Why the Blurry Boundary between Health and wellbeing May not Always MatterTimothy Murphy, PhD, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA 9:30 – 9:45 AM Moving Beyond Therapy and Enhancement in the Ethics of Gene EditingBryan Cwik, PhD, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
Room: Sheraton Gardner A7:00-8:30 am OBS HEADS OF SYSTEMS [CANCELLED]8:30-9:45 D-1: The Innovative Interfaces/SkyRiver vs. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:04 am
," under Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 on the ground that the specimen of use (below) does not show the mark depicted in the drawing, i.e., the drawing is not a substantially exact representation of the mark as shown on the specimen. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:00 am
Recently I was contacted by an attorney who asked “When does the 45 days to bring a motion to compel further responses to RPD begin? [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
(The Sibley Lecture) (Georgia Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:18 am
After all, China merely performed a feat that Americans achieved more than 45 years earlier (and its space station is about the size of the Salyut 1 Russia flew about 40 years ago). [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:40 pm
Smith, 375 N.C. 152, 2020-NCSC-45, ¶ 16.State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:18 am
Right now we're in the audience for this panel at the NYLS conference on writing about the law: Morning Panel #1 (9:30-10:45): Just Cite It! [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 7:01 am
The suit was against 14 as-yet-unnamed Indiana Defendants, John Does 1-14. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
And Mississippi Code § 45-9-55, the court said, “does not provide for a private right of action” by employees who are subjected to the forbidden employer policies. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 3:27 pm
The news report released by The Providence Journal said that the accident happened at about 1:45 Wednesday morning. 45-year-old Paulo Matos was killed when he was working on a roadway project in Apponaug. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 4:28 am
The Board reversed an "ornamental" refusal to register the design mark shown below for vehicle tires, finding that the PTO Examining Attorney had failed to make a prima facie case that the mark is merely ornamental and does not function as a trademark (Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Trademark Act). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 am
(…) For the full Legal Update see: Federal Court Holds That Section 45 of the Competition Act Does Not Apply to Buy-Side Agreements Between Competitors in Hockey Leagues Class Action Decision. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:25 pm
This means if the proposal passes, an individual with an estate valued at over $3,500,000 will have to pay 45% on the excess of the limit up to the first $10 million of assets, 50% on the next $40 million worth of assets, 55% on the next $50 million, and 65% on everything over $1 billion in assets. [read post]
