Search for: "Does 1-5" Results 61 - 80 of 43,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2015, 3:49 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
Justice Flaux in (1) Societe de Distribution de Toutes Merchandises en Cote D’Ivoire trading as “SDTM-CI” (2) Kouma Assitan (3) Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. (4) Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance and (1) Continental Lines N.V. (2) Genshipping Corporation [2015] EWHC 1747, considers the effect of clause 5 of the Synacomex 90 form, upon which the vessel was chartered in this case. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:49 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
Justice Flaux in (1) Societe de Distribution de Toutes Merchandises en Cote D’Ivoire trading as “SDTM-CI” (2) Kouma Assitan (3) Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. (4) Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance and (1) Continental Lines N.V. (2) Genshipping Corporation [2015] EWHC 1747, considers the effect of clause 5 of the Synacomex 90 form, upon which the vessel was chartered in this case. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:54 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
The first meeting is scheduled for November 19, 2019, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 8:06 pm
There are 5 areas that must be satisfied to receive a filing date from the USPTO: (1) the name of the applicant; Who is the owner of the trademark? [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 10:49 am
Does 1-16, an upstate case in which SUNY Albany students are being targeted, the Magistrate Judge has denied the motion by four (4) defendants to quash the subpoena.The Magistrate Judge pointed out in his decision that there were 5 issues, and that he had decided all 5 issues in favor of the plaintiffs.The defendants have 10 days to file objections.February 18, 2009, Decision of Magistrate Judge*-->* Document published online at Internet Law &… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that [...]XVI. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:08 pm
On May 5, 2009, the District of Columbia Council approved legislation by a 12 to 1 vote which recognizes same-sex marriages if they are performed in another jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:46 pm by scanner1
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Respondent and Appellee. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 1:36 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
On Tuesday, Feb 5, from noon to 1:00 PM, Children’s Mercy Bioethics Center is hosting a webinar on the topic:  "Does the Concept of 'Medical Futility' Help Clinicians?" [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Related posts:CJEU rules on Arts. 22 No 1 and 27(1) Brussels I-Regulation CJEU rules on Art. 15 (1) lit. c) Brussels I-Regulation French Judgment on Article 5 (1) b of the Brussels I Regulation, Part III [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:14 pm by Theodore F. Smith, Jr.
First National Bank of Monterey that because of the 2005 amendment to I.C. 30-5-9-2(b), the common law presumption of undue influence does not apply to a transaction even when an attorney in fact benefits if the following conditions exist: 1. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
When Doe made further inquiry by calling the telephone number in the letter, he was told that he had to register for his lifetime.[ ¶5] Shortly after receiving the April 5 letter, Doe filed a complaint against Evert Fowle, in his capacity as District Attorney, and Craig Poulin, in his capacity as Chief of the Maine State Police. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Finance, Mohammed Al-Jadaan, announced on 11 May 2020 that VAT in the Kingdom (currently at 5%) will be increased to 15% from 1 July 2020. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:34 pm by Buce
So: $5 million if you are a mensch; if you just take care of yourself, maybe $3 will do. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:29 am by Veronika Gaertner
French Judgements on Article 5(1)(b) of the Brussels I Regulation, Part II In a recent post, I presented two 2006 judgements of... [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:35 am by Patrick A. Malone
So brace yourself: a new study says that 1 in 5 Americans gets whacked after their ER visit with added charges not covered by insurers for out-of-network care. [read post]