Search for: "Does v. Advanced Textile Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sunspool Corp., 714 F.2d 1573, 1580 (Fed. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Advanced Textile Corp. (9th Cir. 2000) (allowing anonymity where textile-worker-plaintiffs presented significant evidence of retaliation by blacklisting and legitimately "fear[ed] extraordinary retaliation, such as deportation, arrest, and imprisonment"); cf Doe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1064 (9th Cir. 2000) (a district court "may authorize the named plaintiffs . . . to send notice to all potential plaintiffs").Slip op. at 9453-54. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 10:00 am by Jeff Vail
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F. 3d at 1069-71. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Unless it does, we can expect them to walk away from it as much as they can. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
Last week, CIT Chief Judge Jane Restani issued an important decision (PDF) in the case of GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:42 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2000), which outlined a standard for determining whether a litigant may file suit anonymously. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
See AK Steel Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Advanced Textile Corp. (9th Cir. 2000), to assert economic harm is a ground for anonymity. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm by John D. Graham
A little more than five years ago, in a case called Entergy Corp. v. [read post]