Search for: "Doherty v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Mr Stilitz for the Secretary of State submitted that the effect of the clarification and modification in Doherty was far more limited. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am
We expect better from an attorney representing the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Assistance, 433 Mass. 171 (2001) and Doherty v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Assistance, 433 Mass. 171 (2001) and Doherty v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:28 am
The Florida Bar v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
It is reminiscent of John Hart Ely’s rousing exhortation to the United States’ courts that “unblocking stoppages in the democratic process is what judicial review ought preeminently to be about” (J H Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980), p 117). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of M) (FC)… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:40 pm
., v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
