Search for: "Doherty v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Mr Stilitz for the Secretary of State submitted that the effect of the clarification and modification in Doherty was far more limited. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Old Fox
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68.   [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of M) (FC)… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:31 am by David Ardia
With the help of Harvard Law School's Cyberlaw Clinic, the Citizen Media Law Project and a coalition of media and advocacy organizations submitted an amicus curiae brief last week to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in a case involving a lawyer who was arrested for using his cellphone camera to record on-duty police officers.   [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
  If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]