Search for: "Doherty v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Old Fox
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
There have been eight Actos Bladder Cancer trials to date across the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
 United States of America, 2014 SCC 72 (35072) Nov. 14, 2014 Parliament has authorized the cross-border sharing of wiretap communications under s. 193(2) (e) of the Criminal Code, and the disclosure here was lawfully authorized by that provision, which taken as a whole, does not violate s. 8 of the Charter. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
He tried to get the court action against him postponed for a year, but Lord Doherty refused to grant the request.Mr McKenzie then faced a court action at the Edinburgh court. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
  If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is perhaps ironic that Wigmore has had far more staying power in Canada than in his home country, the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am by Schachtman
  The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]