Search for: "Dolan v. City of Tigard" Results 21 - 40 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), the Court explained how close a fit must exist between a permit condition and a project's negative impacts. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), the Court explained how close a fit must exist between a permit condition and a project's negative impacts. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
City of Tigard, in which the Court held that any dedication requirement must be "proportional" to the impact of the property owner's planned project. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:12 am by Steve Davies
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  It was in Dolan v City of Tigard that the concept of “rough proportionality” came to life, requiring that a condition imposed upon development must be related both in nature and extent to the development’s impact. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  It was in Dolan v City of Tigard that the concept of “rough proportionality” came to life, requiring that a condition imposed upon development must be related both in nature and extent to the development’s impact. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am by Richard Frank
Seven years later, in Dolan v City of Tigard, the Court returned to its newly-minted “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine. [read post]