Search for: "Dolan v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 12:37 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
" As Bryan writes, "it also underscores the ongoing need for the United States Supreme Court to finally address whether the heightened scrutiny of the Nollan, Dolan, and Koontz Fifth Amendment takings cases applies to legislatively imposed permit conditions. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:55 am by Erin Miller
United States (08-1394) – petitioner’s reply Tuesday, February 23: Dolan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, Hardt, Rent-a-Center West v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:28 am by Linda McClain
This stands in sharp contrast to a basic tenet of family law in the United States: that civil marriage is a state-created institution and that the state is a third party to every marriage and divorce. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am by Pamela S. Karlan
Here’s the version he asked opposing counsel the final time I got to argue before him, in Dolan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am by Amanda Rice
United States (the “honest services” case) “has led to a string of dropped charges and new trials.” [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 1:04 pm by Cristina Lumpkin
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]