Search for: "Donahue v. Justice Court" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2007, 7:16 am
Updating this entry on Wednesday's Supreme Court decision in Clark County Council and Clark County Auditor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:06 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s blistering dissent in Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:23 pm
The following discussion board post is by Sean Donahue of Donahue & Goldberg, LLP. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At Law360 (subscription required), Bill Donahue reports that in Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:41 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday in the case of Bruce Herdt, Louis Evans and Charlie Milburn v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
At Law360 (subscription required), Bill Donahue reports that during the argument, “the justices avoided using dirty words but voiced concern about the ‘erratic’ way the rule has been enforced. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
Here's a quick guide to all of our posts analyzing the Court's decisions in Mass v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Cleveland-Marshall The law school hosts its Supreme Court Review. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s June 30 decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
The Court granted review in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:31 am
”Noting that Watertown conceded that “the establishment of 207-c procedures is subject to mandatory negotiations (because the procedure affect terms and conditions of employment), Justice Donahue rejected Watertown’s argument that “the interjection of arbitration in the 207-c eligibility process ‘simply guts’ the municipality’s right to determine eligibility and that [Civil Practice Law and Rules Article 78] is the exclusive method of… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Bill Donahue reports at Law360 (subscription required) that in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]