Search for: "Donaldson v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Spain kept not only Texas, but western territories that today comprise much of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.... 1774, in London, England, at the conclusion of 2-1/2 weeks of proceedings in the case captioned Donaldson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:15 am by Kate Fort
These regulations will provide a stronger measure of consistency in the implementation of ICWA and prevent the application of different minimum standards across the United States, contrary to Congress’ intent. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
" In re Donaldson Co., 16 F.3d 1189, 1195 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:11 am by David Canton
DirectTV is the largest provider of satellite-delivered subscription television programming signals in the United States, but is not licensed for sale or use in Canada. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In the case of Donaldson v United Kingdom ([2011] ECHR 210) the Fourth Section held that the application of a serving Republican prisoner alleging a violation of his rights under Article 10 (freedom of speech) and Article 14 (discrimination) was inadmissible. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am by centerforartlaw
Donaldson, however, ruled that original meant “created organically by an author [with] some degree of creativity. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am by centerforartlaw
Donaldson, however, ruled that original meant “created organically by an author [with] some degree of creativity. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
    The United States Supreme Court:   One of the challenges in the prevention of mentally induced violent attacks is the misapplication of the Supreme Court 1975 ruling “O’Connor v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm by James McComish
Anti-suit Injunction Issued By US Court The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit... [read post]