Search for: "Donn Zaretsky"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm
Donn Zaretsky gives us the answer over at his Art Law Blog. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:41 pm
Donn Zaretsky explains how the media is getting this copyright and trademark lawsuit between the Velvet Underground and The Warhol Foundation all wrong. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:39 am
Over at the Art Law Blog, Donn Zaretsky points to Gaylord v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:40 pm
John Cahill, Donn Zaretsky, and Jo Backer Laird discussed issues involving authenticity of art. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:40 pm
John Cahill, Donn Zaretsky, and Jo Backer Laird discussed issues involving authenticity of art. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:19 am
I've had my disagreements with Donn Zaretsky, the author of the Art Law Blog. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:42 pm
Over at The Art Law Blog, Donn Zaretsky discusses the same case, in relation to several other related cases, specifically Pape v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:48 am
From Robert Clarida, by way of Donn Zaretsky at the Art Law Blog. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
Donn Zaretsky, unsurpisingly, took exception to the post I wrote yesterday, in which I strongly condemned his assertion that “you can make the traditional four-factor fair use analysis do whatever you want it to do. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 10:49 am
Thinking more about Mark Stryker's excellent tweet yesterday -- where he basically says in one sentence what I've been trying to say here for about 12 years -- and Everson board president Jessica Arb Danial's excellent piece, I'm reminded of the initial question I had about this whole issue, as quoted in Jori Finkel's New York Times piece all those years ago:"Donn Zaretsky, a New York lawyer who specializes in art cases, has sympathized with… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:50 pm
Judd Tully has a piece in the February Art+Auction on the Christie's decision I wrote about back in November here.I'm quoted in the piece as follows:"The logic of this decision, says Donn Zaretsky of the New York law firm John Silberman Associates, means that 'any subsequent buyer â€â [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:30 pm
Los Angeles Times art critic Christopher Knight has a bone to pick with New York arts lawyer (and proprietor of The Art Law Blog) Donn Zaretsky. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:42 am
Donn Zaretsky’s column looks at whether the state of Texas can make otherwise harmless photographs illegal if the photographer had the wrong intent when he took them. [read post]
"Institutions of every stripe are scrambling for survival in a recession draining them dry of funds"
26 May 2009, 2:13 pm
Why can there never be any other 'use of proceeds,' wonders New York lawyer Donn Zaretsky, 'no matter how important to an institution's mission? [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:43 am
":"Donn Zaretsky, a New York lawyer who specializes in art cases, has sympathized with the National Academy at [The Art Law Blog], asking why a museum can sell art to buy more art but not to cover overhead costs or a much-needed education center. 'Why should we automatically assume that buying art always justifies a deaccessioning, but that no other use of proceeds â€â [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:49 am
Thus, I am particularly pleased to note Donn Zaretsky’s reference to the Philadelphia Inquirer’s conclusion that the new Barnes Foundation building (the subject of a couple of those comments to my original post) shows “obvious respect for Barnes’ legacy – for his idiosyncratic view of how art should be displayed and appreciated – should reassure supporters of the move. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
Decs&Excs looks forward to any comment that may be forthcoming from Donn Zaretsky's Art Law Blog. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:52 pm
Good discussion of the declaratory judgment action Fairey filed against the Associated Press to declare his Obama poster non-infringing and fair use on Donn Zaretsky's Art Law Blog here. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:29 pm
As Donn Zaretsky of the Art Law Blog observed, Knight's most recent column takes the anti-deaccessioning position to its inevitable reductio ad absurdum endpoint: Here’s an idea: Don’t sell the art. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:23 pm
Most notably, Donn Zaretsky of The Art Law Blog has been lampooning it mercilessly for years. [read post]
