Search for: "Donnelly v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and their families. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Rules on Admission of Uncharged Foreign Crimes in Prosecution of Guyanese Drug Kingpin United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:55 am by Eoin Daly
More recently, in Van Orden v Perry [2005], a narrow conservative majority of the Supreme Court held that the display of the ten commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol did not violate the establishment clause, primarily on the basis of the historical, secular significance of the Ten Commandments in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am by Carolyn E. Wright
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
" This is similar to the standard offered by Jeff Wall, who argued for the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am by SHG
Under United States Supreme Court precedent, it is relatively easy to sue police officers who commit misconduct, but federal law still provides enormous protections to prosecutors. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
The epidemiology of raw milk-associated foodborne disease outbreaks reported in the United States, 1973 through 1992. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am by Tom Donnelly
Let’s begin with Bingham’s text: No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm by Marci Hamilton
  She reasoned that banning males from a state nursing school was based on tired stereotypes, which set the stage for the later decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States Supreme Court passed on a case about a similar issue back in 2016, American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]