Search for: "Doughty v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Doughty Street Chambers has announced the sudden and unexpected death of leading media law silk, Heather Rogers KC. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
" Some common sense from Dr Julie Doughty in this Cardiff Law School post.Court of Appeal rules against disclosure in divorce case"The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Secretary of State for the Home Office have succeeded in an appeal against an order that they disclose documents relating to the international criminal activities of a former solicitor. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Some common sense from Dr Julie Doughty in this Cardiff Law School post.Court of Appeal rules against disclosure in divorce case"The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Secretary of State for the Home Office have succeeded in an appeal against an order that they disclose documents relating to the international criminal activities of a former solicitor." [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:56 am by Nani Jansen Reventlow
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in a recent landmark decision, Lohé Issa Konaté v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am by Amy Howe
After the 5th Circuit largely upheld Doughty’s order, the Biden administration came to the Supreme Court, which put Doughty’s order on hold and agreed to weigh in. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Mr Hay sued in libel, stating that the publications had caused serious damage to his reputation and that he had lost bookings as a self-employed tattooist as a result. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Yaaser Vanderman
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]