Search for: "Doughty v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
There was a piece on the Doughty Street Chambers website about the case. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
This is remarkable work by Lara ten Caten of Hansen Palomares, and counsel Jamie Burton of Doughty Street. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am
The Court held that, in principle, the right to respect for private life under Article 8 can extend to the professional lives of the social worker and police officer (R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health and R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Heather Rogers QC is a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Doughty, Documents Relating to the Constitutional History of Canada 1759–1791 (Ottawa: S.E. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
There was a post about the case on the Transparency Project blog by Julie Doughty. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
As noted on the Doughty Street website this is the first occasion on which a court has had to consider the effect of section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
Doughty Street summarised the decision. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
” The Doughty Street Blog has a summary here. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
No positive obligation on States: the Court had found that Article 10 did not confer on a State positive obligations to collect and disseminate information of its own motion (Guerra and Others v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
Doughty Street Chambers also covered the case in their blog. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
Read Doughty Street Chambers’ press release here. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:50 am
The aims as stated when the guidance was first published in 2016 have also been removed. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
” The Guardian had a piece and there was a detailed discussion of the case on the Doughty Street Chambers website. [read post]
