Search for: "Doughty v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
” The Guardian had a piece and there was a detailed discussion of the case on the Doughty Street Chambers website. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
There is a post on the Doughty Street Chambers website concerning the settlement of the Millett v Corbyn libel action, entitled Richard Millett Discontinues Libel Action Against Jeremy Corbyn MP. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
In a series of case from about 2003, the ECtHR began to treat a person’s reputation as being capable of protection by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life: see, for example, Cumpana v Romania (2004) 41 EHRR 200 at [91], Chauvy v France (2004) 41 EHRR 610 at [70] and White v Sweden [2007] EMLR 1 at [21]. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The Doughty Street Chambers website has a comment  on the recent judgment in the case of Versi v Husain [2023] EWHC 482 (KB). [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This wrongly states that Impress made the damages award. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:01 am by S S
Mr Berry was represented by Alice Irving  of Doughty Street Chambers and instructed by GT Stewart Solicitors. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81])  As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am by Charon QC
  The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am by Leah Litman
 Doughty in the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am by Leah Litman
 Doughty in the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. [read post]