Search for: "Downing v. Municipal Court" Results 41 - 60 of 1,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Kentucky Court of Appeals struck down a state law on the subject. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:54 pm by Earl Drott
In cases in which a party asserts they are protected from liability via governmental immunity, the courts will weigh several factors to determine whether the assertion is true, as illustrated in Rivera v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Lehman Brothers International (In Administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:42 am by Mark Carter
The Roscoe v Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) case was released by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia on December 29, 2011. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:00 am by Steven Chadwick
Specifically, as a consequence of the Supreme Court having previously struck down portions of Act 13, the Commonwealth Court determined that as municipal drilling ordinances are enacted under the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, the relevant Court of Common Pleas has exclusive jurisdiction to hear any appeal of those ordinances. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers
There are no judgments to be handed down this week. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
Here's the link - scroll down to the criminal justice blogs and you'll find us. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:18 am by John Diekman
  The statute is not meant as a sword to cut down honest claims, but merely as a shield to protect municipalities against spurious ones. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
In that case, the court struck down an attempted taking of property for farmland because it was a pretext to hide the "true purpose" of the taking for recreational purposes. [read post]