Search for: "Downs v. Jacobs"
Results 1 - 20
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 3:56 am
Jacobs wrote in his March 31 letter, a copy of which was obtained by Delaware Law Weekly, that he will step down July 4, one full year before his term is set to expire. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 11:33 pm
Here is the abstract:Like Bush v Gore in the United States, the decision of Justice Nicholson in Jacob Zuma v National Director of Public Prosecution will undoubtedly be seen as a pivotal case in South Africa's political history. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
In the case of Szafranski v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
In the case of Szafranski v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
On October 18, 2012, in Windsor v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
In Cream v Banerjee Lord Nicholls addressed this provision and said it demanded flexibility in its application. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:58 am
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:42 pm
However, in the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:15 pm
It must have been our painstaking coverage of Calder v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
The Court of Justice put an end to it (or virtually so) with Gat v Luk. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:36 pm
The blurb from AIPPI UK is as follows:Rapid Response: Unwired Planet v Huawei Tuesday 13 November 2018, 5:30 for 6pm start, @Bird & Bird The much-awaited decision from the Court of Appeal in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case was handed down this morning. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:28 am
Briefly: Greenwire’s Jeremy Jacobs reports that the Court’s recent ruling in Horne v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:58 pm
Constitution’s Public Use Clause, evident in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:49 pm
In Duran v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
Jacob Phelps holds up a placard as he protests for his side of the Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:18 pm
On 19 January 2015, the Constitutional Court of South Africa handed down judgment in the case of Democratic Alliance v African National Congress and Another ([2015] ZACC 1), a case concerning text text messages relating to President Jacob Zuma sent to over 1.5 million voters by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in the run up to the 2014 general elections. [read post]
