Search for: "Doyle v. College" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The College of Policing and IPSO reiterated the “moral obligation” journalists have to protect confidential sources. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 1 to 5 February 2021 (Julian Knowles… [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 2 November 2020, Nicol J handed down judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Panel – Medical Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients and Medical Repatriation Moderator – Cavan Doyle, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine Nanette Elster, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine Kayhan Parsi, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine D. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Two recent decisions, Economou v de Freitas and Doyle v Smith, provide some guidance on this question, but seem to pull in slightly different directions. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 2 November 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the libel case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2395 (QB). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
, Tanya Aplin and Jason John Bosland, King’s College London and University of Melbourne Next week in the courts The trial in Yeo v Times Newspapers will continue on 19 and 20 October 2015. [read post]