Search for: "Doyle v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
 Proof that the plaintiff has submitted "enough facts to enable [the] court to determine that a viable" cause of action exists (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d at 71; see Gray v Doyle, 170 AD3d at 971) may be established by an affidavit of a party or someone with knowledge, authenticated documentary proof, or by complaint verified by the plaintiff that sufficiently details the facts and the basis for the defendant's liability (see CPLR 105[u];… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" So it's possible this case may be decided in favor of the state without causing too much damage. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:56 am by sally
Supreme Court Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shah v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2326 (13 October 2010) Dorset County Council v House (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Crim 2270 (13 October 2010) O & H, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2233 (13 October 2010) King v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Crim 2522 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v… [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
Supreme Court oral argument in North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:12 am
This furlough business is a vestige of the Doyle administration. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am by Karen Gullo
For the complaint: For more on ALPRs: Contact: [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:09 am by Adam Gana
” If you invested with JP Morgan and Benjamin Doyle Maleche, please contact Gana LLP at 212-776-4251 or its managing partner at [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am by INFORRM
In the case of Reid v Dukic [2016] ACTSC 344, a man who posted a series of Facebook posts defaming the chief executive of a Canberra football organisation has been ordered to pay her damages of $180,000. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thus, “‘when it comes to Indian affairs, state courts are courts of limited jurisdiction'” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 296, quoting Bowen v Doyle, 880 FSupp 99, 114 [WD NY], affd 230 F3d 525 [2d Cir]). [read post]