Search for: "Doyle v. State Bar"
Results 41 - 60
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:28 am
United States 17-5165Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
The holding in Adams – that the strict liability claims were barred by the statute of limitations applicable to malpractice claims – is suggestive that no separate cause of action for strict liability exists, but that’s not the ruling. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Therefore, we reverse Young's conviction.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:21 am
Doyle, 429 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:15 am
A trio of cases – Doyle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” “The closest parallel is a Ninth Circuit case called Ellis v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
