Search for: "Doyle v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
United States;United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am
The sheriff permits hundreds of out-of-state agencies and several federal entities, including units of the Department of Homeland Security, to run queries of a license plate against information the sheriff has collected. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am
United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Public companies outside of the United States often contemplate whether to sell their securities in the US to access new sources of capital. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of the petitioners, Assistant to the Solicitor General Pratik Shah reiterated that the plain terms of Section 233(a) are broad enough to preclude Bivens actions even if Congress did not specifically contemplate such actions. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
George, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Before: SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.STEPHEN A. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
United States it vacated a Federal Circuit decision and held that when, to protect state secrets, a court dismisses a contractor’s prima facie valid affirmative defense to the government’s allegations of breach of contract, a proper remedy is to leave the parties where they were on the day they filed suit. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog] Other United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:06 am
United States, No. 13-7451. [read post]
