Search for: "Drew v. Merit Systems Protection Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
In Morales v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that a group called “Feds for Medical Freedom” could challenge that requirement in federal district court, despite the provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 channeling federal employees’ challenges to adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board, subject to review by the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The respondent's argument that D18 would not be part of the common general knowledge and cannot demonstrate an enabling character of ENGAGE® 8400 actually pertains to the merits of the discussion and is therefore not relevant for the admittance of D18.1.4 Under these circumstances, the Board has no reason to make use of its discretionary power under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 to hold D18 inadmissible. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 5:24 pm
The DOJ also argued against the Board’s take in the two cases consolidated with Murphy Oil in the Court’s grant of certiorari, Epic Systems Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
The DOJ also argued against the Board’s take in the two cases consolidated with Murphy Oil in the Court’s grant of certiorari, Epic Systems Corporation v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
In support of this argument, the appellant drew attention to the reference in the travaux préparatoires to European patent applications of the same applicant which have the same date of filing.- The board in decision T 1423/07 rightly acknowledged that the longer term of protection possibly available with a later date of filing constitutes a legitimate interest in the grant of the subsequent application. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
The case is Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
" Cady drew an analogy to the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit drew comment. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The board found both appeals to be admissible. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The district court held that Trump’s speech was protected neither by the First Amendment under Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:21 am
Office of Special Counsel (OSC) had a busy week with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), the tribunal to which many government employees appeal adverse actions — often without help from lawyers. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
Hall J., in Schuster v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Finding no merit in Peters's claims, we affirm. 08a0550n.06 USA v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
Metropolitan v. [read post]
