Search for: "Drewes v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2007, 9:34 am
A notice on subscription-only service Lawtel drew the IPKat's attention to C & J Clark International Ltd v Four Star Distribution, a ruling by Appointed Person Ruth Annand on 20 December 2006 against a UK Trade Mark Registry decision.Four Star applied for invalidation of Clark's CICA trade marks for footwear in Class 25, citing a likelihood of confusion with its own earlier CIRCA registered trade mark for clothing in Class 25. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:32 am
State Farm contended the assignment made the SBA the real party in interest. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Santa Fe Industries v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 1:34 pm
A division of property and assets case captioned Ritacco v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part Two
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:58 am
In Romero-Mejia v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
That was the focus of the (somewhat) recent case of Kernal Records Oy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
In Commune d’Ans, the municipality only drew up its neutrality rules after the applicant requested permission to wear her headscarf. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
In Davis v Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:12 pm
Here’s the issue that drew my attention to the “rummy name” case, People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:38 am
When police arrived, their attempts to announce their presence went unheard at which point the police moved to the rear of the house where they observed through a window several adults restraining a teen who had thrown a punch that drew blood. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Greenwood Racing, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:00 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:23 pm
The transcript of today's oral argument in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
