Search for: "Drews v. Maryland" Results 21 - 40 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
One case, Benisek v Lamone, challenges a Maryland congressional district, while the other, Rucho v Common Cause, challenges North Carolina’s congressional map. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
 Our colleague Wallace Mlyniec recently drew our attention to the death last weekend of Clinton Bamberger, who “represented John Brady in the Maryland Court of Appeals and the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:06 am by Ellena Erskine
ShareThe justices will hear oral argument in the last case of the December session this morning: Muldrow v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defense is also mistaken in its reliance on People v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
Wynne, in which the Court struck down a portion of Maryland’s personal income tax scheme, is grossly overstated. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:58 am
It matched the DNA of Brown who had been arrested on unrelated charges in Maryland. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
Carpenter's phone received a call that lasted about four minutes.At the start and end of the call, Carpenter's phone drew its signal from MetroPCS tower 173, sectors 1 and 2, located southwest of the store and whose signals point north-northeast. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:16 am
Supreme Court will reopen the issue of prosecutorial misconduct when it hears oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
Maryland, the court said that in general we don’t want to be micromanaging all the details of state taxation,” attorney Lawrence Rosenberg told the justices at the end of Monday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:09 pm
The Court had not dealt with this matter before and drew from its analysis from a similar situation discussed in Wanex v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
Maryland Court of Appeals, while Jack Martone concentrates on the argument in Roberts v. [read post]