Search for: "Dripps v. Dripps"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 7:22 pm
Over at CrimProf Blog, Don Dripps and Yale Kamisar have a post up about a Miranda case that will be argued on Monday, the first day of the new Term, Maryland v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 6:27 am
The recent cases making new law have arisen under the Sixth Amendment, yet the originalist methodology in these cases calls into question Gideon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Professor Dripps’s paper is both fascinating and timely. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:02 am
But Edwards v.... [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
Recent Supreme Court decisions such as Hudson v Michigan (2006) and Herring v United States (2009) have sparked a new debate over the efficacy of exclusionary remedy, and once again drawn its continued viability as a constitutional mandate into question. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:02 pm
Shatzer (Dripps & Kamisar) Previewing the Coming Term (Part 1): Maryland v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
The focal point for the story was a New Jersey Supreme Court decision, State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
Arizona and Minnick v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
Dripps, Plea Bargaining and the Supreme Court: The End of the Beginning? [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
Sundby, Mapp v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
Dripps 257 Teaching Criminal Law from a Critical Perspective Angela P. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Donald Dripps and Yale Kamizar trace the incremental expansion of Miranda rights since Edwards v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
As is to be expected, in her opinion, Judge Collyer relies heavily on the Supreme Court case of Smith v. [read post]
